thebigbees

Specific Hypotheses

1.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to role over load dimension of occupational stress.
2.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to role ambiguity dimension of occupational stress.
3.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to role conflict dimension of occupational stress.
4.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to Unreasonable group and political pressure dimension of occupational stress.
5.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard Responsibility for person’s dimension of occupational stress.
6.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to Under participation dimension of occupational stress.
7.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to Powerlessness dimension of occupational stress.
8.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to poor peer relation dimension of occupational stress.
9.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to intrinsic impoverishment dimension of occupational stress.
10.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to Low status dimension of occupational stress.
11.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to strenuous working condition dimension of occupational stress.
12.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-awareness dimensions with regard to unprofitabiltiy dimension of occupational stress.
13.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard to role over load dimension of occupational stress.
14.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard to role ambiguity dimension of occupational stress.
15.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard to role conflict dimension of occupational stress.
16.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard to Unreasonable group and political pressure dimension of occupational stress.
17.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard Responsibility for person’s dimension of occupational stress.
18.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self-regulation dimensions with regard to under participation dimension of occupational stress.
19.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to Powerlessness dimension of occupational stress.
20.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to poor peer relation dimension of occupational stress.
21.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to intrinsic impoverishment dimension of occupational stress.
22.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to Low status dimension of occupational stress.
23.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to strenuous working condition dimension of occupational stress.
24.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of self- regulation dimensions with regard to unprofitabiltiy dimension of occupational stress.
25.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to role over load dimension of occupational stress.
26.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to role ambiguity dimension of occupational stress.
27.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation  dimensions with regard to role conflict dimension of occupational stress.
28.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to Unreasonable group and political pressure dimension of occupational stress.
29.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard responsibility for person’s dimension of occupational stress.
30.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to under participation dimension of occupational stress.
31.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to Powerlessness dimension of occupational stress.
32.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to poor peer relation dimension of occupational stress.
33.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to intrinsic impoverishment dimension of occupational stress.
34.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to Low status dimension of occupational stress.
35.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to strenuous working condition dimension of occupational stress.
36.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of motivation dimensions with regard to unprofitabiltiy dimension of occupational stress.
37.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to role over load dimension of occupational stress.
38.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to role ambiguity dimension of occupational stress.
39.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to role conflict dimension of occupational stress.
40.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to Unreasonable group and political pressure dimension of occupational stress.
41.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard Responsibility for persons dimension of occupational stress.
42.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to under participation dimension of occupational stress.
43.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to Powerlessness dimension of occupational stress.
44.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to poor peer relation dimension of occupational stress.
45.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to intrinsic impoverishment dimension of occupational stress.
46.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to Low status dimension of occupational stress.
47.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to strenuous working condition dimension of occupational stress.
48.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social awareness dimensions with regard to unprofitabiltiy dimension of occupational stress.
49.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to role over load dimension of occupational stress.
50.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to role ambiguity dimension of occupational stress.
51.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to role conflict dimension of occupational stress.
52.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to Unreasonable group and political pressure dimension of occupational stress.
53.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard Responsibility for person’s dimension of occupational stress.
54.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to under participation dimension of occupational stress.
55.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to Powerlessness dimension of occupational stress.
56.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to poor peer relation dimension of occupational stress.
57.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to intrinsic impoverishment dimension of occupational stress.
58.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to Low status dimension of occupational stress.
59.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to strenuous working condition dimension of occupational stress.
60.    There is no significant difference between high and low groups of social skills dimensions with regard to unprofitabiltiy dimension of occupational stress.